Think of a scene from the Jetsons, or the movie Blade Runner with air taxis, the police, private vehicles and public transport, all whizzing about through virtual corridors in the air. The Indian government’s Digital Sky concept, pitched as part of India’s draft drone regulations, could look like that.
At a public consultation meeting earlier this month, India’s minister of state for civil aviation, Jayant Sinha, gave us a glimpse of what it could look like: In 5-10 years, we’ll have lots of large drones flying around. To control them, we’ll have unmanned automated air traffic control. “…digital air traffic management and for that, we need digital skies,” he said at the open house which was held as part of public consultations on a new policy that seeks to regulate drones or unmanned aerial vehicle systems.
Even though the idea seems a bit far-fetched, Sinha feels that to develop an ecosystem you have to look five to ten years ahead and anticipate requirements. He also said that companies should also look at developing drone solutions to solve problems that we currently face in transportation in India.
“Why not use the problems of India, of congestion, of traffic etc to really come up with fabulous new technologies and solutions. That’s what we have to do and that’s what these standards and regulations are intended for,” the minister said.
The system he envisions involves mapping the skies in 3D and the ability to file in digital flight plans through a dedicated portal by entering the origin and destination coordinates. The flight approvals would be digital and faster. The traffic, being managed by a digital air traffic management system, will clear the airspace according to the file flight plan filed, which also has to be downloaded into the drone software.
All this sounds futuristic. But does the policy draft reflect that?
Getting down to the details
The Indian draft drone regulations for operating UAS was published by the government earlier in November this year. The draft was open for comments until December and public consultations were held in cities including Delhi and Bengaluru.
Many felt that the draft drone regulations were a bit too stringent, but Sinha says that many of the regulations are in place in the interest of national security. Companies, individuals and educational institutions who operate drones are concerned about some of the aspects of the policy.
Revisit the weight category
One of the primary concerns raised by the drone operator’s community, that includes companies and individuals, was that the weight classifications, especially in the micro category, should be increased. Currently, micro UAVs are classified up to 2Kgs of weight and companies want the DGCA to revisit the weight classification in this category.
“For any useful application like industrial or in other similar sectors you will require a sizeable payload and that will cross the 2 Kg mark and usually come near the 4 Kg limit,” Neel Mehta, co-founder and director of drone manufacturer Asteria Aerospace told FactorDaily. The micro category has fewer regulations to comply with as compared to other categories.
Operational altitude to be increased from 300 ft AGL to 400 ft above ground level
Drone operators who provide services such as aerial survey and mapping complain that the maximum altitude to fly a drone specified in the draft must be raised. The lower you fly the less area you can cover. Their ask is to raise operational altitude from 200 ft to 400 ft above the ground level.
“For large-scale drone operations, like survey, mapping and agricultural use cases, 400 ft AGL is the sweet spot between good resolution data and optimal use of the battery,” Gokul Kumaravelu, Policy lead at Skylark Drones told FactorDaily.
According to Kumaravelu, current imagining sensors used in services like aerial survey, 400 ft AGL is the ideal height to operate so as to ensure that you have covered the most amount of ground and also get good quality data. “Flying at 200 ft will result in higher battery consumption and the data you collect will make the processing very hard because files become very heavy for processing,” he said.
Better access and flight limitation at test site
According to the draft regulations, there are 24 test sites assigned across India which many feel are too few and too far from cities. One of the suggestions from the attendees was to allow testing in pre-monitored spaces test zones like ones owned by organisations like Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) which are already operational and in use.
“One of the primary requirements as a drone manufacturer or developer is to have easy access to test sites. Either DGCA can assign and monitor these test sites or authorise other agencies who have the space for testing to do the same on their behalf,” said Neel Mehta.
Also according to him, since these areas are designated as test sites, operations in these areas should be allowed beyond the regulated limits of weight and height so that the boundaries of the drones and other UAS can be tested.
Training protocol for drone pilots
Another concern raised was about the lack of clarity on the training of drone pilots. Pilot’s operating drone in the ‘min and above’ category and some other use cases are required to get an Unmanned Aircraft Operator Permit (UAOP). But there is a lack of clarity about how and where this license it to be obtained.
Many operators and companies also feel that training or licensing required for drone pilots and the minimum age limit can be a barrier to adoption. The drone pilot training requirements in the draft regulation look complex and similar to that required by pilots of manned aircrafts.
“It is important to keep the training aspects of RPAS (UAVs) congruent with the nature of the equipment. Such equipment does not require knowledge of certain aspects of manned aircraft operations, which is a large part of the reason for their popularity. They have the ability to democratize the benefits of the aerial perspective without the complication of having a man-on-board,” Ankit Mehta, Co-founder and CEO of Ideaforge told FactorDaily.
Aeromodellers want out
The aeromodelling community has come out strongly against the draft drone regulations. Hillol Biswas, Director, (Aircraft Engineering), DGCA who was also at the open house said that the DGCA has already received a signature campaign comprising of about 3600 aeromodellers from across India who have raised concerns about policy being applicable to model aircrafts.
They want a separate regulation for aeromodelling activities as in Australia and other countries. The community feels that, Aeromodelling which is more of a hobby than a commercial activity, will be stifled if the new regulations come into place and have demanded that model aircrafts should not be clubbed with drones when it comes to regulations.
The final drone regulations
The last date for comments was on December 1st and the DGCA has said that it is already aware of many of these concerns and are already looking into them. The final drone regulation is expected to be out in January 2018.
Subscribe to FactorDaily
Our daily brief keeps thousands of readers ahead of the curve. More signals, less noise.
Thank you for reading FactorDaily
We hope this story worked for you.
Our journalism is produced by some of the best brains in the story-telling business who believe that good stories have only one master: you, the reader. Bringing these stories to you, just so you know, costs us a pretty dime even as the context of disruption remains unchanged in the journalism business the world over.
If you like what you read here, consider supporting the FactorDaily journey. We don’t have a paywall because we believe access to good journalism must be free to all, especially when it is in public interest and informs citizens with independence and accuracy. Such stories should not be restricted to a few who can pay. You are free to support us with any amount you like.
Please note that 18% of your contribution will be paid to government as GST, per Indian accounting rules.
Disclosure: FactorDaily is owned by SourceCode Media, which counts Accel Partners, Blume Ventures and Vijay Shekhar Sharma among its investors. Accel Partners is an early investor in Flipkart. Vijay Shekhar Sharma is the founder of Paytm. None of FactorDaily’s investors have any influence on its reporting about India’s technology and startup ecosystem.